Because they have perfect bodies and the best style, sometimes, it is not compatible…. ¡And we don't care exactly!
The edition “Body Issue” GQ has just defined Cristiano Ronaldo and Alessandra Ambrosio as the most perfect bodies in the world. ¿Is right? Totally. ¿These protagonists have style? A little. ¿they should have it? Nor do I believe that it is important. Recall that the style is not valued, charisma, fashionista personality or essence (since in that case the Portuguese footballer would not appear in the ranking anywhere near)… We speak, only, of skin issue (¡but what skin!).
It fascinates me greatly that leave Cristiano Ronaldo with the crotch of an Action Man
There is no doubt that (we like more or less) tanto the player as the model could be defined as perfect bodies rise and long average «cuerpazos» mundial. Working hours in the gym and a privileged genetic shake hands to demonstrate that nature is sometimes a bit unfair. Pero ¿the images have been given that slightly cani touch? or is the opposite, ¿we see the photos a little grayer than normal because of what we associate them?.
The shots were taken by photographer Ben Watts and respond to the focus of the publication of masculine cut and less oriented moda, sino a lifestyle. Pero the stages, estilismos (more nonexistent than anything else), postures, gestures and lights give us a remote style of a glamorous photo shoot (as he was attempted in Vogue with Cristiano and Irina), but they lead us to a path with touches canis.
Reflection I wanted to put on the table is whether the passion for the gym and aesthetics ¿Belongs intrinsically to some social group? Sometimes the cult of the body is somewhat associated with the “tronista” profile” who values the physical more than the intellect. ¿We are trying to unify tastes as global as deportation to something so focused?
In Myself opinion I think not, que each “urban tribe” has its own health and beauty codes and rituals – and everyone is equally frivolous and considers different styles perfect bodies. Perhaps it is true that a more direct way of attacking canis is by saying that part of their muscles prevent them from forming culturally, but ¿Is this true? ¿They are not individual personal decisions? ¿Can't run on the treadmill while reading? ¿Professors don't go to the gym?
A lot of questions with the same lot of answers, and no 100% successful. Pero, por favor, as always I advocate in this my blog, and every day more people, Leave aside prejudices and tastes and passions Respect each. SEPARATE IS NOT WORSE. If you want to read Dostoyevsky while listening to classical music, perfect; But do not think better than those who prefer to go to the gym while your spotify sounds blaring electronic music. Because it must be clear that the perfect bodies depends on the tastes of each.
It is about, only, decision, personal tastes and abilities and interests ¡and blessed difference! ¿Can you imagine the world full of clone people? ¿you imagine everyone in perfect balance mind – Body – alma? ¡what deep boredom!
And I leave you with a quote from Albert Einstein that I love and that makes my feet back on the ground every time I come up to me I creyéndomelo
"We are all very ignorant. What happens is that we don't all ignore the same things”
